Search This Blog

25 Eylül 2012 Salı

Cartoon: French satirical magazine prints Muhammad cartoons


Chappatte cartoon
© Chappatte in "Le Temps" (Geneva)
This cartoon by Chappatte relates to the decision by French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo to publish a series of cartoons featuring the Prophet Muhammad. Many French newspapers have rushed to the defence of Charlie Hebdo. Others, however, accuse the paper of acting irresponsibly in the current context.The cartoons come in the wake of violence in Libya and elsewhere in the Middle East, starting last week, in response to an anti-Islamic video produced in the state of California by a US citizen.
COMMENTARY
The cartoon shows French philosopher Voltaire in the offices of Charlie Hebdo. Voltaire quotes the phrase he is most associated with (usually written as 'I disapprove of what you say ...), but qualifies it by saying that he doesn't understand what the cartoonists are trying to say. The message seems to be that the right to freedom of speech is a fundamental value, but needs to be exercised responsibly.
NOTE
The most oft-cited Voltaire quotation is apocryphal. He is incorrectly credited with writing, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” These were not his words, but rather those of Evelyn Beatrice Hall, written under the pseudonym S. G. Tallentyre in her 1906 biographical book The Friends of Voltaire. Hall intended to summarize in her own words Voltaire's attitude towards the principle of freedom of speech. (Source: Wikipedia)

Reuters Video: Airbus's new way to travel

Passenger aircraft flying in formation like birds are likely to be a feature of aviation in the second half of this century, according to plans revealed by aviation giant Airbus.
TRANSCRIPT 
REPORTER: It's not a display by the Red Arrows. In fact, it's a realistic vision for the future of air travel, according to the world's largest manufacturer of passenger jets. Aircraft flying in formation, about 1 kilometre apart, could be a feature of aviation by 2050 on high-traffic routes under a plan produced by Airbus. The company's engineering chief Charles Champion says the idea - modelled on the way birds fly long distances - will reduce fuel consumption.
CHARLES CHAMPION: "When you're behind other aircraft you actually save ten to fifteen percent fuel. So it really works and in fact the birds put that forward in order to minimize the energy to fly long distances so it's all about actually bio-mimicary and taking the lessons learned from nature."
REPORTER: The company says that by the middle of the 21st century flights in Europe and the USA could on average be around 13 minutes shorter, cutting down on fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. They also envisage aircraft climbing more steeply on take-off to minimise noise and allow for shorter runways. Aviation analyst Howard Wheeldon welcomes the ideas, but warns it'll take more than aircraft technology to implement.
HOWARD WHEELDON:  "It isn't just the aircraft, it isn't just the fantastic engine technology, it is also the operation of the airlines. It's governments, it's regulation, it's looking at themselves how they can do things better, and allow aircraft to get into airports, in airports and through airports a lot faster."
REPORTER: However unlikely this might look now, Airbus insists their blueprint will be helping passengers get from A to B more efficiently within decades. Edward Baran, Reuters.

Words in the News: On The Cards

On the cards
The Independent says people with homes worth more than £1m face a rise in their council tax bills as the coalition Government considers new taxes on wealth. Full story >>
VOCABULARY
If you say that something is on the cards, you mean that it is very likely to happen. • Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart's break up is almost a forgotten history now and marriage is on the cards.

Reuters Video: Peugeot reverses out of French index

Ailing automotive group PSA, maker of Peugeot and Citroen cars, has dropped out of the French CAC 40 index raising new concerns about the company's future. Sonia Legg reports.
TRANSCRIPT
REPORTER: Peugeot was a founding member of France's CAC 40 stock market index . But on Monday - after 25 years - it was replaced by Belgian chemicals group Solvay. PSA Peugeot Citreon, as it is now known, has been hit by a Europe-wide sales slump. It's not alone but its arch rival Renault has weathered the financial storm better and many want to know why. Since January Renault's shares have risen 41 percent while Peugeot's have dropped 43 percent. Christophe Wakim is from Exane BNP Paribas.
CHRISTOPHE WAKIM: "There are concerns about Peugeot's future so this is why probably those investors sold Peugeot shares."
REPORTER: In July Peugeot posted a first half net loss of 819 million euros and said it was consuming 200 million euros a month in cash. Job cuts inevitably followed - 8,000 French posts on top of 3,500 already in the pipeline. A French plant will close and another will be scaled down. There'll also be cuts to capital expenditure and research and development. But restructuring takes time and the cash burn won't stop until 2015. This new blow won't help.
CHRISTOPHE WAKIM: "When a stock belongs to an index like the CAC-40, it automatically attracts funds, passive funds that are the index trackers who have to buy stocks from companies in the index to replicate its performance. Also, belonging to the CAC 40 is kind of symbolic."
REPORTER: Peugeot's fate has also become a political hot potato. Fighting unemployment was one of Francoise Hollande's election pledges. Last week, unions at the condemned plant outside Paris called on the President to honour his promise and save their jobs. That may now prove even harder to justify. Sonia Legg, Reuters.

Cartoon: Dying for the New iPhone


The launch of Apple's new iPhone 5 has inspired quite a few cartoons (see collectionhere). This one is by Jimmy Margulies is the editorial cartoonist for The Record, in the northern New Jersey suburbs of New York City.
The cartoon features two scenes. On the left, people are queueing (or waiting in line, if you're American) at an Apple store to buy the new iPhone. On the right, Chinese workers are entering a Foxconn manufacturing plant (where the iPhones are assembled).The title of the cartoon is 'Dying for the new iPhone'.
EXPLANATION
The cartoonist uses a play on words. If you are dying for something, you want it very much. • It's so hot. I'm dying for a beer. However, there have been a number of suicides at Foxconn plants, where the working conditions have come under intense scrutiny, so people are literally dying as well. 
DISCUSSION QUESTIONShould we feel guilty about (or think twice before) buying products from companies (Apple is not the only 'culprit') who outsource production to suppliers with dubious labour practices in the developing world?

LATEST NEWS"On Sunday evening, a riot broke out at the company’s Taiyuan, China, plant on Sunday evening. More than 2,000 employees were involved, and it took more than 5,000 police several hours officers to bring the disturbance under control. Although many were injured, it was first thought that there were no deaths. Unfortunately the riot was much worse than initially reported, and ten workers have now been pronounced dead, according to reports." (source: Cult of Mac).  


The iPhone 5 (Parody) Ad: A Taller Change


The iPhone 5 (Parody) Ad: A Taller Change

One of the most talked about features of Apple's new iPhone 5 is the taller screen. This hilarious parody ad (or 'spoof') takes this idea to the extreme. You can see the 'official' iPhone 5 video (which itself verges on parody) here.


3 Eylül 2012 Pazartesi

How I Met Myself - Themes & Moral Values

Salam Eid Mubarak and Happy National Day everybody!

I received some questions asking how to answer the literature-novel questions for How I Met Myself. You may download the notes and tips from here: Download

The file contains:
  1. A short note on the main themes and the moral values of the novel.
  2. The answer to "A character who shows determination." (Simple and advanced answers)
  3. The answer to "A character who tries to solve his/her problems." (Simple and advanced answers)
  4. The answer to "A theme in the novel."  (Simple and advanced answers)
  5. The answer to "A lesson/value learnt in the novel."  (Simple and advanced answers)
You may choose simple or advanced answer depending on your level of English. You may also mix the simple and advanced answers together. If you can write the advanced answer in the exam (with no or less errors), there's a big chance for you to get full marks.

I hope that the notes help. Do not hesitate to ask me any questions.



#Twitterspam works because...

most people are actually,
                                                  deep-down, 
narcissists?




To be a spammer in 2011, you have to major in Human Psychology?

Practice makes perfect?

I mean there is a sort of cleverness in their approach, isn't there?





I seen a real bad blog about you. http://link2avirus

Have you seen this photo of you? http://going2wreckhavoconURcomputer

Check out this video with you in it! http://love2spam

Given the amount of people who spam me each week, because their accounts have been hacked BECAUSE they were silly enough to click through on one of these..  I think I've got to stop wondering how/why people are silly enough to fall for this trap and got to start slapping some kudos on the devious as they definitely know how to get folks caught in their webs.

If I can apply this to anything in terms of my professional development as an educator, then I'd have to say it really emphasizes my belief that learning has to be personal to prick, to stick.  

But anyway, folks, seriously, read and take note:

If you get this sort of message from someone you don't know, don't click on it. 

Does Gender-Segregation in Classroom Lower Second Language Acquisition?



For decades, proponents of gender-segregation in classrooms have argued that separation of children by gender fosters a successful learning atmosphere. However, recent studies have shown that segregating classrooms by gender impacts student learning negatively.

The negative effects of separate classrooms are apparent in linguistics especially, where girls tend to develop strong academic abilities earlier than boys. Establishing gender-segregated classrooms denies boys and girls the opportunity to learn from each other, and reinforces the long-ago debunked idea that "separate but equal" is effective in institutions of learning.

Research conducted at Tel Aviv University suggests that girls help foster a stronger learning atmosphere in classrooms, and that both boys and girls benefit from being in mixed gender classes. The study found that test scores were higher overall in many areas, including reading comprehension, science and math, when boys and girls were in mixed classes. Test scores increased for both genders, and a high ratio of girls was linked to enhanced learning.

This data is supported by older education studies, which found that girls tend to excel in language arts as young children, while boys consistently develop later. This difference is true of children in many countries, and from many different linguistic backgrounds—not just in English-speaking high-income families with parents who can afford the cost of further education, be this at home, sending their children abroad or even via a distance learning program such as an online PhD education.

Whether the disparities in language acquisition are based in the brain or in upbringing, marked differences do exist between boys and girls, especially in elementary school classrooms. Listening to their female peers speak and interacting with them during classroom and playground activities helps boys to develop stronger language arts skills.

Schools who have attempted to institute gender-segregated classrooms have often seen an overall decrease in test scores, which shows that gender-segregation in schools is not effective for either boys or girls.

Another chief drawback of segregated classrooms is that they do not allow children to share their knowledge and experience with each other, but rather perpetuate gender-based cultural disparities. Learning how to interact with different people is seen as a key goal of education, especially in early childhood. Children who are deprived of the chance to interact with peers of different genders may have trouble relating to or communicating with individuals of the opposite gender later in life.

Many psychologists who focus on child and adolescent development have voiced concern that gender-segregated classrooms impact the social skills of students well into adulthood. They perpetuate unfounded stereotypes about how men and women are different, and contribute to gender-based prejudice.

The effects of gender-segregated teaching can have an impact on older students as well. Decreases in test scores occur in single-gender classrooms in both middle and high school, and grade point averages in general fall. This decrease in GPA can adversely affect students as they apply for college and scholarship opportunities. Depriving students of their best chances to enter excellent colleges and secure funding does them a disservice. The goal of public education should be to prepare individuals for successful careers and successful relationships, both of which are harmed by gender segregation.

Many of the ideas that proponents of gender-segregated classrooms have introduced into public discourse are nothing but old prejudices in new forms. These individuals argue that boys and girls are inherently different, and that they should thus be separated in classrooms. They argue that boys are more aggressive than girls, and that girls can only learn in cooperative environments. As the American Civil Liberties Union has noted in lawsuits against school districts with sex-segregated classrooms, none of these beliefs have been substantiated by science.

  • But what do you think - should boys and girls be separated? Why or why not?
  •  Have you noticed any differences in the way that males and females learn languages?


Blog post author
Brittany Lyons aspires to be a psychology professor, but decided to take some time off from grad school to help people learn to navigate the academic lifestyle. She currently lives in Spokane, Washington, where she spends her time reading science fiction and walking her dog.

How did English become the Global Language?


One of the things I did today was comment on Scott Thornbury's blog post, O is for Ownership... and in my ramblings I talked about how sometimes ideas are out there, floating about in the greater Universe, simply lurking, waiting to be captured by he who listens and is prepared to act.  (It's that sort of day).

Those sorts of thoughts come, I guess though, from my youth when I was a NewAger and instead of being a reflective English teacher and practitioner or even a student,  I wrote NewAge articles philosophizing on the questions of one's path through life - instead of

"How do we learn?" "What is motivation?"
"How can the new technologies help us teach Speaking?' I wondered how we transformed from monkeys to... well, whatever we are now.



 
Even though it was a long, long, long, long time ago and many years have passed since those days of adventure, climbing up into volcanoes and knocking back beers while lying on Asian sandy beaches, curled up around men with long wise beards in front of dimming fires while arguing over the very nature of our beingness, the story, no matter how fantastical, of the 100th Monkey never really left me.

So today, through the rambling stroll of a streaming mind, the philosophy that we learn from those around us, consciously, subconsciously and through the trawling of multi-dimensional layered communications recorded in the shared higher consciousness, I am led to only this question:

How did English become today's one Global Language?

Okay, it's not completely, yet it surely is on the way.  By 2020, a prediction not a fact, a greater majority will speak it than those who don't, right?  It isn't the easiest language.  Nor the prettiest.  It is instead a messy code, made up of archaic irregularities, tortuous, nonsensical rules and ridiculous tongue-defying pronunciations.

So what on earth, or beyond earth, happened to set this particular meme into play?

When did the Tipping Point occur?

Who were the players, who washed the first sweet potato, who made washing it important? Who decided that English should take the place of Esperanto?  Was it life itself?  Was it a bunch of academics studying applied linguistics unraveling the codices of the brain and because they happened to be English speaking, while sharing the nature of our brains ability to learn, the onus was on English to prove the hypotheses... or was it the availability of native English speakers racing across a globe to have an adventure while earning a little cash?

Was it a curtain coming down or a wall falling down?  Was it the Almighty Dollar or Nike's abuse of children in factories? Was it Coca-cola's fault or a legion of British soldiers conquering a New World?

How did it all happen so fast?

We talk about our students' needs to learn English but somehow we don't ask how that need arose in the first place.

Does anyone have thoughts or theories?

Fixed Acquisition Order? = No Evidence

Fixed Acquisition Order? = No Evidence

I'm busily packing up the stack of books I used for my MA assignment on Methods and Approaches while looking into authentic materials, yet before I take them on back to the library, I thought I'd share a little snippet I came across.

It's this:

"Very briefly, there is substantial research evidence to support the use in language learning of the linguistically rich, culturally faithful and potentially emotive input supplied by authentic texts. What is more, there is little evidence of a fixed acquisition order, which is the rationale for the use of phased language instruction and which is often used to repudiate the use of authentic texts for language learning.  (Mishan, 2005:11)

So not to harp on about all this again but what gets me when I read this is if publishers and textbook authors aren't simply churning out carbon copies of each other, albeit with ever glossier, shinier pictures than the last lot, then why do these tomes always start off and carry on virtually the same way?

Why do teachers teach the verb to be, there is/there are, present-tense followed by present-continuous, question words, prepositions of time and place and adverbs of frequency* and so on and so forth, ad infinitum?

And to top it all off, horror of all horrors, why do so many students think this must be the way to learn a language?


Did we come to this ideology because the holy books have logos on them, thus convincing us that there were at some point, a bunch of wise and saintly academic authorities who like monks in monasteries, researched language acquisition before writing up their commandments?  Who made this "order" - who publicized it? Who pushed it?  Where did it come from?


Have our beloved and not so loved at all textbook authors ever done any research into whether this "order" works or not, feel free to state your claim if so, or have they too assumed it to be so because their editor (or his boss) said so?  I do really want to know... if this phased language instruction has ever been tested scientifically, systemically, qualitatively, quantitatively, longitudinally and by whom because I'll happily eat my hat if you can prove it so.  Show me, please, where are the peer-reviewed research articles documenting the processes that occur and don't occur - why folks must learn just so?  Surely, truly, it can not be that with almost one third of the world now learning English and millions of others learning other languages that we still can't answer this rather simple and professional question? 

Or is our industry made up of snake-oil salesmen dancing in pale moonlight?

Of course not.  But nonetheless, I'm not kidding, be it down to good intentions or not, this billion-dollar grossing industry can not really have just been compiled on good faith alone, or can it?

Because it seems so.

Today, despite that I now have access to fields of journals I will tell you that not for a want of trying can I find one single verified report showing brain scans done on language learners proving on any kind of level that the brain receives and organizes grammatical structures this way.  Countless snoringly dull case studies and endless fascinating assessments to wade through that go into the depths of our practices and into what makes a good language learner and what doesn't, what strategies teachers can get students to employ, the effects of motivation, aptitude, age and gender studies and how there really is no best method, no there isn't... and yet, nope, nary a word on this so called fixed acquisition order, stage by stage and step by step, despite the fact that so many of us somehow continue to hail the god of grammar.


Sweet Words vs Monstrosities


More than a century ago, Henry Sweet wrote The Practical Study of Languages and through it, criticized the existing methods of the day, much as we still do now.   The book's myth-busting objectives reviews phonetics, alphabets and pronunciation issues before diving into methods, grammar, vocabulary and texts. 

In fact, while scanning through the text, I honestly couldn't help but think I bet he'd have been a blogger if he were around today.  His prose is tight, easy to read and the language direct.

His obvious annoyance at the 'insufficient knowledge of the science of language' (1899:3) like my own, literally jumps off the page.  Given that this post is part 2 of No Evidence for a Fixed Aquisition Order, I'll hone in on this one quote which I wanted to share with you, for reflection, as it neatly wraps up the debate on authenticity vs manufactured texts:

...the dilemma is that if we try to make our texts embody certain definite grammatical categories, the texts cease to be natural: they become either trivial, tedious and long-winded, or else they become more or less monstrosities' (1899:192).

Really sounds like he was describing Headway long before it ever arrived to influence all the other copy-cat productions from then on and into today.  The question is though, will it influence tomorrow's or can we teachers at least try to stop it before it does?

Extrinsic "VS" or "AND" Intrinsic Motivation?

 Extrinsic "VS" or "AND" Intrinsic Motivation?

n the last couple of weeks prior to restarting classes, I've been watching a lot of television. The weather's not been particularly nice and I'm too poor to do anything else.  That's the downside to being a student at my age, I guess.  The upside is: imagine the best conference you've ever been to and think of one of the great presentations - one that has really had an impact on your teaching... now imagine that instead of a 45 minute session you get to have access to months of amazing lectures, group discussions and articles to read to follow up and challenge yourself with.  So, poverty is worth it, I guess.

But anyway, back to TV, one of the theme songs, from Weeds, has become a real earworm.  It goes, for those of you who don't know it,


"Little Boxes, little boxes, on the hillside, little boxes all the same
There's a green one and a pink one and a blue one and yellow one 
And they're all made out of ticky tacky and they all look just the same..."

The song makes me think about motivation, a lot.  Or maybe I was thinking about it before the song and it just drummed it in.  We all know that learning doesn't happen without motivation.  But what is it really?   Where does it come from?


Usually, it gets boiled down into three categories:


Extrinsic Motivation (external influences)
e.g. money, rewards, good grades, trophies, certificates, job position

Intrinsic Motivation (internal influences)
e.g. enjoyment of a task, passion, a drive to seek challenges, autonomy, inherent satisfaction

Intrinsic motivation refers to doing something simply because it is enjoyable while extrinsic motivation is more about getting a specific value or outcome based on what you have done (Ryan and Deci, 2000).

Amotivation is basically when you can't be bothered.




It has also been determined, through extensive empirical research by Deci & Ryan, Vallerand and others over the decades, that extrinsic rewards put a damper on intrinsic motivation.   I think though, that we have to be a bit cautious with this sort of thinking as it could very easily lead one into an assumption that extrinsic motivation is bad and that intrinsic motivation is best.  A dangerous position I feel, because for the most part, whether we like it or not, our adult language learners are more likely to come to us extrinsically motivated than intrinsically.

They want to learn English to integrate into society, to get a job promotion, to ensure job security, to get a better pay cheque, to speak to their foreign colleagues and close the deal.  If not this then they want to know that when they go on holiday, they won't get lost.  Sure, there are a handful of housewives who just fancy learning it, but usually because someone else told them it is the "thing" to do. And the teens mostly just want to pass the course, get the certificate, and get on with life.

So where it all gets a bit sticky for me, is that sometimes our extrinsically motivated learners really enjoy learning.  Why not, after all?  Sometimes we teachers can inspire them and sometimes their colleagues do and sometimes they develop an interest for the language - but all this interest and high from learning a second language does not take away their primary extrinsic goals.

In more recent research, Ryan and Deci have made a point of re-examining extrinsic motivation more closely, placing extrinsic motivation on a continuum and have created this taxonomy:



The idea is that learners can be in a state of external regulation (wanting rewards or avoiding criticism), or one of introjected regulation (constraints are internalized and set by the learner).  Identified regulation means that the behavior is thought of as being self-determined and finally the last type is integrated regulation - the person learns willingly because it fits in with the rest of the life activities and life goals (Vallerand, 1992).

Despite the fact that there is so much literature on extrinsic and intrinsic motivations and I'll continue reviewing it all, I really can't help but wonder if motivation is not actually something quite fluid. Can't you (or our learners) be one type and the next day, another?


But more importantly, if by categorizing motivation into boxes and then onto further hazy sub-boxes, might we be missing out on the fact that humans are infinitely complex creatures who can be both intrinsically and extrinsically motivated at exactly the same time?


What d'ya think?

English: time 4 a revamp?

English: time 4 a revamp?

Nothing so amazes me more than the fact, that despite so many other languages havie large governing bodies which analyze, stay on top of and make changes to their language in order to better fit the times, that English doesn't.

I think we should, especially as its reach extends across the globe.

If I could change the English language., then I would





- add an extra grammatical tense:  The "Ever Present" Tense
  • it annoys me somewhat to tell students to use the present for "habits, permanence, facts." If it's for all time, then there should be a specific tense that refers to this because for most people, present = now.


- I'd add two extra pronouns to reflect gender reality.
  • heshe and shehe


- I'd also love to revamp spelling entirely to make it better reflect the way words sound
  • if the ch sounds like an sh, it should be an sh
  • regular past tense endings are a waste of time teaching.  Why not write workt not worked, filld not filled - loaded can stay loaded.

What do you think?  Any bug-bears you've noticed while teaching our fair language?  What would you change if you could?


Best,
Karenne

Why I don’t like Second Life (by Jacqueline Goulbourne)

Imagine a world where you can make a cartoon avatar of yourself and do whatever you like in an international community of English speakers.

Well, it already exists, in Taiwan where I have spent most of my career teaching,  it's called ‘World of Warcraft‘ and the mission of almost every parent of teenagers there to wrest their kids off of it!  But imagine if something similar existed, primarily for education, business and sex.  That exists too and I’m fairly certain that it’s nothing we’d really want to get students involved in.

I’m sure many of you disagree and are using Second Life in your practice to good effect, so my intent is not to disrespect your work, but to explain the problems I have with Second Life and other such virtual worlds.

I first experimented with Second Life in 2003 when friends of mine had set up an experimental teacher training space.  I didn’t really get interested.  More recently I came across Second Life in a wee teacher training course I’m doing.  I fought against my inherent tendency to not engage with things that don’t resonate with me and decided to ‘join in’ and not be such a negative Nancy.  Although I have an aversion to ‘virtual worlds’ and to speaking through machines in any way (I don’t use telephones) I put this aside in order to try and retrieve any babies in this bathwater.

I Googled up Second Life and was met with this screen:




The user sees this screen with avatars that can be chosen.  Your avatar can be customised later on but I immediately took real exception to the prototype avatars that were presented for customisation.  These include a slightly scary rabbit, a robot and lots of white kids who clearly resembled extras from a 90s vampire film.  The only black woman present is wearing a short dress with a flower in her hair and high heeled shoes - a very different aesthetic to the white women presented.  One of the men has a shirt open to show rippling pecs but generally, the male figures are covered up.  For me, it doesn’t represent an acceptable aesthetic to present to students in my care, particularly young women.

There are two strands to my  misgivings: firstly the absence of ethnic diversity and secondly, the overt sexualisation of young women, in the Second Life avatar choices.   As a teacher joining in, I tried to choose an avatar that could represent my self without making myself ridiculous.  I’m 37, pretty fat, greying, and generally get dressed in the dark.  My choices ranged from avatars that mostly looked like a 14 year old version on myself: pale skinned, bone thin, and dressed in black with lots of eyeliner and it seemed undignified and self-abasing. 

I’m not scarred by the experience. But then I’m a confident, English-speaking adult.  I can articulate why I don’t want to be this 1990 version of myself and tried to change it.  Can we expect young, perhaps not so good at English students to raise their own misgivings to their educators or will they simply go along with what the teacher, or the authority wants them to do?  Thinking back to my time teaching junior high school girls in Taiwan, none of those prototype avatars is of Han Chinese or any other Taiwanese ethnicities.

What’s the message here?

White people (and the token African American) own English. You are different. Go get yourself a white identity to join our English-speaking world!

OK, yes, you can choose to brown/yellow/black up later if you want to, but that’s not the standard issue human in this community.

Don’t we want our students to come and sit at the table as equals? To join the English-speaking communities that they are passionate about?

In my Real Life classes, every kid is a beautiful prototype of the individual they want to become as they are: be they fat or thin, with braces, wearing unsexy clothes - with a wonderful inheritance of Chinese ethnicity, not something to be tagged on later, once they have chosen their ‘core’ avatar.

Am I over-thinking this?

Perhaps, but if we use these tools in the classroom, we are also raising the question of who ‘owns’ English.  We have to ask who funds a lot of these communities and to what business or political ends?  To promote ELT as a British, Australian, White American/European activity?  Why?

Is that congruent with our principles, desirable for our personal teaching contexts?

Cartoon images hurt as much as photographic images.

As a teacher I’m rarely didactic and I know I can’t change the world, but I am absolutely committed to making every child  in my care feel like they can be whoever they want to be and that includes valuing and celebrating every child’s individuality and identity and not promoting certain images as a norm within an educational context.

Those Greedy Publishers (by Sue Jones)

 Those Greedy Publishers (by Sue Jones) 

t's a super honour for me to present a special guest post for you on the issues of finance within the ELT publishing industry, by a true veteran of the business.  The post is in response to a discussion we were both a part of in the IATEFL Young Learner Yahoo Group and I'm delighted to host it here.





Are you amongst those who can’t even look at a textbook without feeling annoyed?

Let me try and explain why you needn’t feel like this, even if you don’t like text books, never use one and may have personal views about individuals in the business as well!




How did textbooks start?

Usually because some smart teacher arranged,organized, sequenced, sliced and diced and generally managed the material to be taught in a way that helped her, produced results, and her colleagues found it helpful and time-saving as well. So those smart teacher-publishers rapidly became rather richer, so of course they started to look around for other subjects to apply the same approach to.

To do this, they learned how to deal with the mimeograph machine, or haggle with printers, how to store and distribute in practical and economic ways, howto find other teachers who could assemble content in a meaningful way to other teachers, how to find others who could manage and improve these teachers’ work, and so on. Thus publishing companies were born.

In that original print-based world, an initial one-time investment is made in the creation of the fixed format of the book, and then of course the more copies sold, the more attractive that fixed amount looks when spread over a very large number of copies, amortizing (paying off a debt over a period of time) the initial investment to reach a break-even point, after which it’s all profit.


The cost of printing

Of course, there are some costs related to each individual book – the cost of printing, and the royalty paid to the author. Those two sums have to be paid on every single book. But there’s an upside to printing - the larger the number of copies printed, the cheaper each one becomes, because the key cost in traditional printing is associated with the initial setting up of the print run – cleaning printing plates and presses, making and mounting the film and so on.

This outlines the basic print publishing business model – find out and offer what people really feel is valuable to them, invest a fixed sum once to create it, and replicate it at reasonable cost many times over.

So two different sorts of publishing investment is required. One is a fixed, one-time investment (the editing, design, planning, research etc to get to a point where there is something to print) and the other is a variable cost, which depends on the number of books printed and sold (the per-copy printing cost and author royalty cost), and which is paid on every single copy.

This means it is extremely difficult, not to say impossible, to say exactly what each individual book costs to create. If the book sells well, the amount of the fixed, pre-press investment will look quite small on a per-book basis, and of course the converse is true.

A wrinkle in this picture is that the costs of some of the items in the pre-press investment may be considered overhead – the salaries and overhead connected with maintaining editorial, marketing and sales staff, for example. This overhead is probably not taken into the costs for each individual book.

Of course the publisher’s goal is to invest once, cover all those costs as well as contribute to the cost of maintaining the necessary overhead, have the cash flow to continue to be able to print as required, and when all that has been paid for, to have a profit – a surplus after all the bills have been paid and the revenue from sales has come in. It sometimes works and it sometimes doesn’t. So it helps to have a lot of books, so that some are moving into the market and will take a little while to become profitable, while others are at their peak and yet others declining.


Complexities to costing

While this business model is essentially simple, there are complexities this picture doesn’t capture. For example, the publisher is almost certainly not the final sales point for the book. This may be a local retailer in the international market, a local education or school district distribution point in some countries, or Amazon etc. To make the book available to the buying public, the publisher offers a discount, which inevitably means the price the ultimate consumer pays is not the price the publisher receives. In overseas markets, the publisher may give 60% or 70% discount, so the amount the publisher receives from what the customer pays may be only 30% or 40%.

In addition, publishing is a very time-sensitive business. Books must be available when schools open. Often teachers won’t commit to a book without seeing that the whole series is available. The effect of all this is that the publisher has to make all investment up front, before a single book has been sold. If there has been any delay in receiving payments from the previous year (more common than you would think), or if a book didn’t sell as well as expected, the publisher may need to buy cash flow from the bank. This of course adds to the publisher’s costs.

So if you pay £20 in a bookshop, the publisher will receive between £14 (if the discount is only 30%) and £6 (if the discount is 70%). Nowadays most books are targeted at specific local markets and it is rare for the exact same book to sell throughout the world - there are exceptions, mostly amongst books published before the mid 90s, and there’s a reason for this, which is that the massive increase in computer and desk top publishing since the mid 1990s has made it much easier to be a publisher.

This led to massive fragmentation and increase in numbers of publishers serving their own specific, local market. This increased level of competition leads in turn to greater sales and marketing cost, which may now be 5-7 times greater than editorial overhead costs. In attempting to manage this risk, publishers avoid anything experimental or outside the normal publishing pattern, leading to a lot of over-similar books. (Perhaps in any case be argued that since books are chiefly used by mainstream, time-poor teachers, this is the area of greatest demand – adventurous teachers can and will create their own experimental materials.)

The end result

The result of all this is that negotiations for adoptions rapidly become focused on price or added value (additional give-away items, seminars, sometimes even downright bribery which is of course now very severely punished under new UK legislation). So although there are of course authors who have made a good living, there are no longer authors who have literally made a fortune.

The publisher will already know what the expected price will be and have made all calculations with the likely end revenue in mind. It’s likely that the print cost will be in the region of £1 – this varies according to the size of the book (format), number of pages (extent), the number printed (print run), number of colours, weight and type of paper, type of cover. The author royalty will be in the region of 10% of the final price the publisher receives. After that, the publisher needs to use the balance to cover all other costs – fixed pre-press investment, overhead and other costs, some of which I have mentioned above. So the picture of profitability (or loss) only really emerges over all the years the book is actively in the market.


Still think they're so greedy?


A 35-year veteran of ELT publishing, Sue sees this career as three distinct stages – then, in between, and now. ‘Then’ was when ELT course materials were special, valuable things, so there were fewer of them around and they were easy to sell (which suited the hedonistic lifestyle she enthusiastically pursued as a rep in Greece). ‘In between’ got going in the 90s, when the wide availability of computers removed barriers to entry to the publishing business. For a lengthy period Sue published materials for Latin America after a spell Asia, based in Hong Kong. ‘Now’ has seen periods as managing director of two different publishers in the US and UK, as publishers struggle to identify a way forward into the flexible, creative, digital world they’d like to be in, but which hasn’t really settled into identifiable business models with clear market segments.

"The Dog Ate My Internet"

...was the smart retort from one of my professors, Gary, today when I gave a reason for not being able to do my required Blackboard discussion homework on top of the articles we had to read. 

In the last few weeks I've been using a pay-as-you-go-dongle and its bytes were being chewed up at a very costly rate... which, on top of the life-changing move, is why I've not been around much in the last couple of weeks: not on the 'net, not writing emails, not FBing and all that.   It was all quick in and quick out.  Also, alas, my grandfather died recently and I'll be heading to his funeral on Friday.
But anyway, yay! The Internet is now installed at home, I have finally got my bed from Ikea although I haven't put it together yet, I have curtains up instead of propped up pieces of cardboard, I have a schedule, I have lightbulbs...  I know where my highlighter pens are although I think I may have lost my glasses.
The course tutors have been piling on the work, reams and reams of articles, 25 - 50 pages long plus book chapters to read and I swear that when they list out what else they recommend reading that there could well be an evil-grin-glint in their eyes.

That part, because I'm so keen :-) you know, trying to read it all, (even some referenced articles mentioned at the bottom of assigned) ...  all wound up becoming a bit overwhelming and on Monday I ran on over to the disability office (I'm dyslexic) to say I was freaking out.  
Nice counselor there told me it was normal to freak out and I instantly stopped freaking out.

I think I need to take a more eclectic approach - but oh,oh,  it's so hard to choose - what if I miss out on something truly groundbreaking... complain as I might about pages of stuff to read, the truth is by golly, even with the articles I don't really like, that I want to simplify and break down into you know, English, teach so much.   
This old dog is definitely picking up some new tricks.


Beyond Approaches, Methods and Techniques

The most interesting work for this module that I read last week was perhaps Diane Larsen Freeman's concluding chapter of Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching.  She has a really good voice - easy and clear, and warming - she's a really-have-been-there-and-done-that-author.   In this chapter she discussed the changes in methodology over the years and provided a really good overview of the different approaches.

I found this particularly interesting laid out, like this, as I can't say that before now I have never actually thought about how much the way that an adult learner might have been taught previously might well affect the way he learns now or how he wants to learn now.  
I thought her statement "What makes a method successful for some teachers is their investment in it" particularly interesting - I wonder if dogme works in my classroom because I simply believe it does.  
Two other phrases which really caught my eye were "learners are very versatile and can learn well sometimes despite a given method rather than because of it" and "teachers who teach as if their practice causes learning, while recognizing that they are not in control of all the relevant factors, and that at the least they are in partnership with their students in this enterprise, can be true managers of learning."
I am not fond of the term, managers, managers are a little too much like a throw-back to the top-down boss effect.  I like coaches better.  I wonder if that's a sign of the times, of these times, 2011 influenced as we are by the Business gurus and their pop psychology.  But, I tend to think that a coach encourages, motivates, builds his team.  And a classroom pulling together needs a strong, warm lead.



Psychology of Language Learning

I'm auditing this class which means I participate as a guest and have to do the assignments but won't get assessed at the end.

I really would wish it could be one of my core modules but I'm planning on doing an ISS in year two and I need to save the credits.   Our Dutch professor is a very interesting character... a coach.  
He gave us an article by Susana V. Rivera Mills and Luke Plonsky called Empowering students with language learning strategies.  This is probably the most marked up of all the texts I had to read last week and the only one I read through more than once and then reread the comments in the margins again, prior to class. 
In class this morning, Juup had us critique and analyze some of her core points and terminology  and it was jolly good fun to give it a (respectful) bashing.  I highly recommend reading it, looking out for phrases like "instructors whose students posses misconstrued notions about language learning need to provide guidance to avoid their tendency to use less effective strategies" but don't expect any real practical advice on how to do that.
In her introduction she repeated a vital question raised by Dick Allwright in 1984 - a question I have been asking for years "Why don't learners learn what teachers teach?"  But her article was pretty theoretical, so I didn't walk away with any 'a-ha' moments.

Still it discussed things like how good strategies affect motivation and wound up reminding me of my own questionings on whether or not, the term I probably incorrectly refer to as "peer-induced-motivation," has any influence over the end-"product."




Evaluation and Design of Educational Courseware

I thought I was going to wind up in the quagmire... blinded by statistics and non-educational examples and too-much-for-the-brain-to-take-in-lists of principles, on printer-costly chapters from Dix and Norman, in the random pursuit of a main point or two.
However, the briefer Wilson, in Raising the bar for instructional outcomes, did serve one up and that is this: 
e-materials need to be 
efficient, 
effective 
and engaging.

He also talked about mythic story structure in e-design, referencing Joseph Campbell's journey of the hero (usually used in Hollywood -see my dogme post).

I really suspect I'll be reading more of his work and that I may well have more to say on this subject in the coming weeks/months.


Best,
Karenne
p.s.  For the next two years, Tuesdays are now going to be taken up with my self-reflective, what did I learn on my MA-EdTech&TESOL.  I hope you don't mind the diary style sort of entries and I might well waffle on a bit...  if you want to skip these, then Thursdays will be for the more lesson oriented stuff and Sundays will be the EdTech-SocialMedia comments/tips posts.  
p.p.s. For all you amazing folk who've sent your good wishes via blog and FB and Twitter and for your interesting comments here on the blog last week, so sorry - the dog ate my internet - I'll respond this week :-).


Fossilization and then some Krashen

Fossilization and then some Krashen

This morning's walk to classes was a half-hour battle with an umbrella against icy rain and I can safely say that winter is now upon us here in Manchester but at the moment, as the night closes in, I'm sitting in front of my computer with a nice hot-water bottle on my lap, my toes firmly ensconced in last year's Christmas present of sheepskin bed slipper boots. 

I hate cold so it's a good thing with all the articles the professors cook up for us to read that the heating's been turned up in my brain.
 

One of the tasks last week, for this week, was to think of what makes "a good speaker of a foreign language" and then to think of a particular challenge that you currently face or have faced when teaching Speaking.

We had to research the issue, select an article from Google Scholar and then come back into class to share what we learned.

I chose to look at fossilized errors, a subject I've written about before (but one also swallowed into the
dark-world-of-lost-posts-don't-even-ask-where-Google-put-it, I'll have to repost it soon)
because it's a subject that utterly fascinates me.
I mean why do some learners, despite a significant amount of comprehensible input, say the wrong thing over and over again, even when they are corrected over and over again?   Even when they are repeatedly exposed to the correct form via media, conversations with native speakers.  
You know the sort of errors I mean?  
e.g
"I stand up" instead of "I wake up"
The a - e - i mix up
 Trouble with filler words like, "well"
I suppose, at the end of the day, it comes down to L1 interference (first language getting in the way when producing speech in the second language) but why do some of our learners never go through this while others hit major stumbling blocks?  It isn't an age thing, if we're honest, now is it?  It isn't a gender thing... and sometimes, though not always, they are undoable...
e.g.
a) placing a picture of the difference between standing up and waking up on the table as a cue card

b) teaching a mnemonic device, Send Emails with your iPad from Apple
with others, only practice seems to do the trick, with others it doesn't matter what you do, that error has been fossilized like an insect stuck in amber.
So, thus with my interest pricked, I set off on a trawl through Google scholar.   The first article I came to was by a young lady in China who pretty much put it down to not enough concentration on form in the beginner levels of classes.  I pretty much agreed with her so moved on to see if I could get something juicier.   
This one led to one of those 
"oh.my.goodness.how.come.I.never.thought.about.this?"  
experiences.

Dr Han has compiled a list of the Five Central Issues in Fossilization in an article for the International Journal of Applied Linguistics and in it, along with discussing the sort of errors I'd been noticing, she also discussed the fossilization of level.  When the student ceases to make any further progress in the level attained.

Have you ever come across this sort of thing in your classes - when your learners, week upon week, year upon year, stay at more or less the exact same level?  

To be honest, I would probably name this state "stagnation" because I don't think it's necessarily permanent, it is very contextually and situationally dependent, don't you think?

Her article was a really good overview and a really good springboard to digging deeper, but like so many scholarly articles, there aren't concrete suggestions on how to deal with these issues.


Which brings me to the psychology module, where we had to read some Krashen.  For all you die-hard-the-man-is-a-god-folks, sorry... the article we had to read was, sorry-to-say-out-loud, rubbish.

Obviously he's contributed greatly, enormously, to the field of Second Language Acquisition, but in Comprehensible Output? for System in 1998, he seemed to suggest that Comprehensible Output (CO) is too rare to make any real contribution to linguistic competence...  (CO is when learners notice that they don't know how to say something correctly in the L2 or they've tried to say something meaningful but it all went pear-shaped and no one knew what they were saying, so they change it - make it simple/ ask for help and in modifying the intended phrase/structure learn something new about the language).. 

In this article, Krashen suggested that students don't enjoy being pushed to speak (hogwash, mine did... the issue is so level dependent - so culturally dependent - so classroom dynamically dependent -so why-they're-learning-English dependent - so how-did-they-learn-English-before-influenced etc) and then he went on to say that high levels of linguistic competence are possible without output - that basically, input is all a language learner needs!

Raised my blood pressure that article did - I mean - by golly, at least a million students all across the world who've studied languages, whatever language, were made to do so through readings and listening, year upon year, but did not get the opportunity to speak and, blanket statement of mine, they would disagree with this viewpoint.   I wonder, is it Krashen's fault that they are now mute because some textbooks authors thought he was right?   Hmm...

Also, I think I'd even go so far as to say: if fossilization occurs at any one particular stage in the learning process, then I'd be very tempted to pick a time when new language is obviously received, in that moment, the brain makes a use-it-or-lose-it-decision... and I'd lay the blame of error/level fossilization at not having enough freedom moments in class - at not being able to say things wrong in order to learn how to say them right.

But then, whadda-I-kno',

Le Sigh

Le Sigh


Im making this blog post mainly as a supplement explanation to my facebook relationship status reversal.

Basically, I wasn't really as into Dawn as I thought I was. I wanted to be in a relationship so bad, that I was basically just forcing myself to like her. It definitely showed while we were fooling around, or when I'd make up an excuse to postpone her visit to the next day. My heart wasn't really in it, and that wasn't fair to her.

Also, to go from 7 years being single, to suddenly being in a relationship was really overwhelming for me, and my anxiety took hold and that wasn't helping matters any either.

Also, upon further reflection during my work day today, I realized we didn't actually have a super ton of things in common. There were a few things, but she didn't enjoy things that I liked. All we really did when she came over was watch a show, and then fool around. There was no real connection there.

Frankly I went to quickly into this, without stopping to be honest with myself. I was just too excited about the prospect of a relationship.

So yah, after a long drawn out day of worrying and fussing to myself while I worked (super productive day at work as a result), I phoned Dawn up this evening, and broke up with her. While I like to try to take comfort in the fact that I was doing the right thing by not drawing the relationship out longer, hearing Dawn get upset on the phone and almost cry made me feel like dirt. I doubt I'll eat tonight because I feel like such a dick.

However, my sister says I did the right thing. She called me up like instantly after I changed my status. She said I shouldn't feel like a dick, because I'd have been a bigger dick if I didn't break up with her after realizing I wasn't really all that into it.

So I don't know. Its a bit confusing really as I try to sort myself out a bit. I know I don't feel bad that we're broken up. I feel relieved that I'm not putting on a charade. However, I do feel bad that I didn't end it sooner and instead lied to myself about what I felt. As a result it made it harder on Dawn. Blargle.

I'll be fine, with time. I just felt like writing this blog for now for those who ask what happened, because it'll be a while before I really actually feel like discussing it.

What kind of toothpaste do you use

What kind of toothpaste do you use


I have used auqafresh original for as long as i can remember but today i saw a comercial for rembrandt deep whiting toothpaste. i have been smoking a lot and was trying to get my pearly whites back. so i went ahead and gave it a try and was very disappointed. the box and tube itself seemed very classy and i was kinda excited to use it. i squirted some toothpaste out and found the tube was pretty much half gone, plus after brushing my teeth it left the worst aftertaste. I have decided i am going to switch back to auqafresh.



Are fossil fuels a thing of the past?

Are fossil fuels a thing of the past? Modern society runs on energy. It powers almost every aspect of our lives. Yet the infrastructure and approach to energy generation is far from modern in most developed nations. This, plus the ever-increasing appetite for energy in developing regions, presents a global energy challenge that no one nation can solve alone. Looking at the global energy mix, it becomes apparent that conventional energy sources are simply unsustainable. According to US Energy Information Administration figures for 2009, coal and peat still accounted for 40% of energy production, with gas at 21% and oil at 5%. Burning these fossil fuels to generate electricity and heat added 12 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere in 2011. Traditional fuel production processes are also unsustainable. For example, shale gas requires 4.5 million gallons of water per well for hydraulic fracturing. A 500 megawatt coal plant uses 2.2 billion gallons of water annually. Nuclear power may not produce pollutant gases but it has still left us with a global inventory of 180,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel needing to be dealt with safely and securely. How can we begin to address such a massive global challenge? The shift to a new energy paradigm is already underway. The promise of renewables is being realized, with distributed generation technologies, like solar, gaining acceptance at an accelerated rate. According to IMS Research, a specialist in market research on all aspects of the solar photovoltaic (PV) value chain, global PV growth is expected to double by 2016. But we are only at the beginning of a truly sustainable energy revolution. Making solar energy more accessible can further unlock its true potential. Over the last decade, the development of solar PV has mostly focused on making better-performing systems that are less complicated to install. Today, the installation of solar energy systems is still largely a specialized trade. But new technologies, such as microinverters, are turning solar arrays from high-voltage systems requiring advanced management training, into safer low-voltage systems that are more accessible. Imagine a world where any general contractor, roofer or electrician can grow their business by offering solar as a complement to their services. Even “do-it-yourselfers” would now have the ability to take their energy costs into their own hands. This seemingly far-off dream is already a fast-approaching reality, with the result that solar is poised to break into the mainstream. Building a new, decentralized energy infrastructure, in which the points of generation and consumption are not separated by hundreds of miles of transmission lines, is certainly a challenge. But accessible solar, as part of a larger sustainable energy mix, presents practical solutions to the modern global energy challenge. About the author: Paul Nahi is president and CEO of Enphase Energy, a provider of microinverters for the global solar energy industry. Enphase is one of World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneers for 2013. Pictured: An abandoned gas station is seen at the side of a road. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

How to Vlog Like a Pro - Vlogging Tips from YouTube's NextUp Vlogger, Scooter Magruder [Creator's Tip #53] m YouTube's NextUp Vlogger, Scooter Magruder




Advice & Tips from YouTube's Next Vlogger, Scooter Magruder

 

 

ReelSEO: What are some tips and ideas you have for us vloggers to really make the vlogs stand out and do well?
Scooter Magruder: Find someone who inspires you.  Look at their techniques and tips.  Copy the techniques but give them your own personal spin.
Be sure to notice little details in the vlogs you admire including when the music cuts in and out or their intro, backgrounds, etc but let these techniques reflect your own personal style.
RS: Who are some of the one that you guys watch the you learn from?
Scooter Magruder: Look at all types of vloggers.  There is something to be learned from every type of vlog - especially those who are targeting your same target audience.
RS: Can you what outcuts and jet cuts are?
Scooter Magruder: An outcut basically is when you hear the audio before you see the video.  A lot of these vlogs talk really fast when they're talking and they outcut.  So you can get a  lot more in in a short period of time.  So something to look at is jump cutting and L cutting.  Just search it on YouTube and it really helps out, especially when you’re first starting off.
RS: What about content?  How do you come up with your next idea for your next vlog?
Scooter Magruder: I draw from just life, life experiences.  So things have happened to me, I’ll just want to make a video about it.

Best Practices for Building User-Friendly Connected TV Applications Applications


Applications


So I started doing some research to compile what I could on making apps for the connected TV platform. I tried to find all the API guides and docs I could find as well as some basic tips on creating a good user experience for the platform. I figured some of you could really use a single location to get all of this information and now you've got it.
First off, this is not about connected TV ad platforms, I already wrote that up. This is more about creating video + data experiences for consumers to view through their TV.

Google TrueView In-Stream Takes AdWords for Video Mobile Source: Google TrueView In-Stream Takes AdWords for Video Mobile

Yesterday, on the Google Mobile Ads blog, Phil Farhi, group product manager at YouTube, announced that TrueView in-stream video ads have expanded their reach to mobile devices. TrueView in-stream videos can appear on YouTube Videos (Watch pages on YouTube), on video publisher pages in the Google Display Network (includes YouTube), and on video publisher pages outside the network.

TrueView advertisers are only charged when the video ad is seen through to completion or hits the 30-second mark if it's a longer ad. The ads are skippable after five seconds. Google says this option allows for better engaged viewers who only watch the ads they want to and interaction rates are higher.
Since brand awareness was found to rise 24% and engagement rose 17% when ad campaigns span multiple screens: TV, phone, PC and tablet, getting a campaign to those screens should be vital to your campaign's success.

With TrueView and AdWords for Video you can now reach three of those screens. Four if you consider the rise of connected TV options which allows viewers to watch YouTube videos on their TVs.
TrueView is quite successful for Google, according to their internal tracking. As of late last year it he percentage of viewers who choose to watch an advertiser’s message was holding steady at 15-45 percent. They also say that, on average, TrueView in-stream ads reduce audience drop-off by 40 percent when compared to regular pre-roll ads.
It's now easier than ever before to get your campaign out across multiple screens as an advertiser. As a content producer on YouTube, it also means you could see an uptick in your revenue from the mobile platform as these ads start to get implemented. YouTube did say that they were still testing the ads on mobile but it looks good so far. I have been doing some minor testing of my own this morning and have yet to see the TrueView skippable ads on any YouTube videos I was checking out with my iPad. In fact I couldn't even get any on my Android phone either. It seems they must still be doing the roll out. I did see ads, but they weren't skippable, so I abandoned the videos. If they had been skippable, I wouldn't have abandoned them. So that means no one got a view and no ads were seen nor paid for. Hence why the skippability of the TrueView ads is so cool. At least the video content would have been seen in my testing.
For all the information on getting started with TrueView and Adwords for Video, head over to the

Streaming Video Gaining Ground on Broadcast TV for Connected TV Users Source: Streaming Video Gaining Ground on Broadcast TV for Connected TV Users


Following up on my previous article from the YuMe Connected TV White Paper which focused on advertising and ad-supported content, I also wanted to take a look at the content itself including what people are watching, when they watch it and, rather importantly, how they find it. Streaming TV and movies are viewed multiple times per week, it's discovered by search or recommendations and for a variety of reasons.

Methodology

The statistics presented in this report were generated from data collected between May 24 and June 4, 2012 from an online survey of viewers. The survey was conducted from a sample group of 736 connected TV consumers about their experiences with Internet-based video and content displayed on a TV screen.
The viewers, between 18 to 54 years of age, use Internet video or content on a TV screen connected
to the Internet via game consoles and Blu-ray players, as well as streaming devices directly
connected to the Internet such as Roku, Apple TV, Boxee, or Smart TVs. The number of households
connecting their TV screens to the Internet represents 30 percent of Internet-connected households.

Connected TV Streaming Content Viewing

It seems that streaming TV, streaming movies and watching TV itself were most prevalent in most parts of the day. This runs parallel to another report I talked about where viewing time varied by device and type of content. There is some variation here but it's not as fine grain as that previous report.
yume connected tv time Streaming Video Gaining Ground on Broadcast TV for Connected TV Users
More than once a week, users streamed short-form content (26 percent) more
frequently than they viewed TV shows on networks (24 percent), and nearly as often as they viewed
TV streamed from the Internet (29 percent) and streamed movies (31 percent). Still, daily TV viewing was dominant with 44% saying they watched TV shows on networks. The drastic drop off is in the rest of the categories with a full 10% saying they never watch network TV.
content connected tv Streaming Video Gaining Ground on Broadcast TV for Connected TV Users
Professionally-produced full-length and short-form videos not on TV and cable are surging in
popularity, with 67 percent of respondents saying they watch these. Many are moving to these outlets for video entertainment mostly when they feel "there is nothing on TV," closely followed by when they want to relax. Catching up on past episodes is quite popular as well. Additionally, and perhaps just as importantly, when they can't find the movie they want on TV.
why connected tv Streaming Video Gaining Ground on Broadcast TV for Connected TV Users

Streaming Video Discovery on Connected TVs

The majority of content that consumers are watching on connected TVs is found through search, either a direct input search or via a menu or store. Second screen search for content is still quite popular with a third of respondents using that method. Recommendations, both social and algorithm-based, are also showing success as well.
discovery connected tv Streaming Video Gaining Ground on Broadcast TV for Connected TV Users
What this last chart tells me is that, it's extremely important to have a full-featured recommendation system in your connected TV apps, including social, popular and recommendations based on user behavior and viewing patterns. That also means that all of your content needs as much meta-data attached to it as you can get in there to make sure the videos are found and offered to the consumers.
Along with that, 25% of users said they will type in a URL. That means your websites need to have a connected TV version or be made to play nicely with those platforms. Need help? Check out my tips and best practices article on building apps for connected TV. You might also check out my round up of connected TV advertising services.